Friday, 8 July 2016

javascript - why this.setState going to "is not a function"?

Im trying build simple app to learn how to make api calls.
When I'm trying to setState in react with onClick function I'v created, every time I'v tried to invoke I get




not a function




I tried to bind this like this:




this.setState(() => ({
rowPos: null
}).bind(this))


but that did not worked also, I get the error:




(intermediate value).bind is not a function





there is constructor with state object:



constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
endpoint: 'https://jolapatola5.fakturownia.pl/invoices.json',
params: {
api_token: 'B5Lg3uPBCMcDNX5lsQOM/jolapatola5',
invoice: {

"kind": "vat",
"number": null,
"sell_date": "2019-07-14",
"place": 'Lublin',
"sell_date": "2019-07-14",
"issue_date": "2019-07-14",
"payment_to": "2019-07-21",
"buyer_name": "aaa",
"buyer_tax_no": "5252445767",
"buyer_street": "aaa",

"buyer_post_code": "",
"buyer_city": "",
"seller_name": 'aaa',
"seller_street": '',
"seller_post_code": '',
"seller_city": '',
"seller_bank_account": '',
"seller_tax_no": '',
positions: [{
"name": "Produkt A1",

"tax": 23,
"total_price_gross": 10.23,
"quantity": 1
},
{
"name": "Produkt A1",
"tax": 23,
"total_price_gross": 10.23,
"quantity": 1
}

]
}
}
}
this.removeProductRow = this.removeProductRow.bind(this);
}


and method I'm trying to invoke onClick:




removeProductRow(id) {
let rowPos = this.state.params.invoice.positions[id];

this.setState(() => ({
rowPos: null
}).bind(this))

console.log(rowPos)
};





id is passed when I'm mapping components



The result I'm trying to perform is set the this.state.params.invoice.position alias rowPos to null, now its an object.



Thanks for any help



EDIT: there is the way I'm mapping components:




{
this.state.params.invoice.positions.map(function(item,index){
return
this.removeProductRow(index)}/>
},this)
}

No comments:

Post a Comment

c++ - Does curly brackets matter for empty constructor?

Those brackets declare an empty, inline constructor. In that case, with them, the constructor does exist, it merely does nothing more than t...