Monday 25 July 2016

.net - How do I get a consistent byte representation of strings in C# without manually specifying an encoding?




How do I convert a string to a byte[] in .NET (C#) without manually specifying a specific encoding?



I'm going to encrypt the string. I can encrypt it without converting, but I'd still like to know why encoding comes to play here.



Also, why should encoding be taken into consideration? Can't I simply get what bytes the string has been stored in? Why is there a dependency on character encodings?


Answer



Contrary to the answers here, you DON'T need to worry about encoding if the bytes don't need to be interpreted!



Like you mentioned, your goal is, simply, to "get what bytes the string has been stored in".
(And, of course, to be able to re-construct the string from the bytes.)




For those goals, I honestly do not understand why people keep telling you that you need the encodings. You certainly do NOT need to worry about encodings for this.



Just do this instead:



static byte[] GetBytes(string str)
{
byte[] bytes = new byte[str.Length * sizeof(char)];
System.Buffer.BlockCopy(str.ToCharArray(), 0, bytes, 0, bytes.Length);
return bytes;
}


// Do NOT use on arbitrary bytes; only use on GetBytes's output on the SAME system
static string GetString(byte[] bytes)
{
char[] chars = new char[bytes.Length / sizeof(char)];
System.Buffer.BlockCopy(bytes, 0, chars, 0, bytes.Length);
return new string(chars);
}



As long as your program (or other programs) don't try to interpret the bytes somehow, which you obviously didn't mention you intend to do, then there is nothing wrong with this approach! Worrying about encodings just makes your life more complicated for no real reason.



Additional benefit to this approach:



It doesn't matter if the string contains invalid characters, because you can still get the data and reconstruct the original string anyway!



It will be encoded and decoded just the same, because you are just looking at the bytes.



If you used a specific encoding, though, it would've given you trouble with encoding/decoding invalid characters.


No comments:

Post a Comment

c++ - Does curly brackets matter for empty constructor?

Those brackets declare an empty, inline constructor. In that case, with them, the constructor does exist, it merely does nothing more than t...