Monday, 28 November 2016

c++ - Address of start block storage

Answer


Answer





The allocation function attempts to allocate the requested amount of
storage.
If it is successful, it shall return the address of the start of a
block of storage whose length in bytes shall be at least as large as

the requested size.




What does that constraint mean? Could you get an example it violates?



It seems, my question is unclear.
UPD:
Why "at least"? What is the point of allocation more than requested size? Could you get suitable example?


Answer



The allowance for allocating "more than required" is there to allow:





  1. Good alignment of the next block of data.

  2. Reduce restrictions on what platforms are able to run code compiled from C and C++.

  3. Flexibility in the design of the memory allocation functionality.



An example of point one is:



  char *p1 = new char[1];

  int  *p2 = new int[1];


If we allocate exactly 1 byte at address 0x1000 for the first allocation, and follow that exactly with a second allocation of 4 bytes for an int, the int will start at address 0x1001. This is "valid" on some architectures, but often leads to a "slower load of the value", on other architectures it will directly lead to a crash, because an int is not accessible on an address that isn't an even multiple of 4. Since the underlying architecture of new doesn't actually know what the memory is eventually going to be used for, it's best to allocate it at "the highest alignment", which in most architectures means 8 or 16 bytes. (If the memory is used for example to store SSE data, it will need an alignment of 16 bytes)



The second case would be where "pointers can only point to whole blocks of 32-bit words". There have been architectures like that in the past. In this case, even if we ignore the above problem with alignment, the memory location specified by a generic pointer is two parts, one for the actual address, and one for the "which byte within that word". In the memory allocator, since typical allocations are much larger than a single byte, we decide to only use the "full word" pointer, so all allocations are by design always rounded up to whole words.



The third case, for example, would be to use a "pre-sized block" allocator. Some real-time OS's for example will have a fixed number of predefined sizes that they allocate - for example 16, 32, 64, 256, 1024, 16384, 65536, 1M, 16M bytes. Allocations are then rounded up to the nearest equal or larger size, so an allocation for 257 bytes would be allocated from the 1024 size. The idea here is to a) provide fast allocation, by keeping track of free blocks in each size, rather than the traditional model of having a large number of blocks in any size to search through to see if there is a big enough block. It also helps against fragmentation (when lots of memory is "free", but the wrong size, so can't be used - for example, if run a loop until the system is out of memory that allocates blocks of 64 bytes, then free every other, and try to allocate a 128 byte block, there is not a single 128 byte block free, because ALL of the memory is carved up into little 64-byte sections).


-

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

c++ - Does curly brackets matter for empty constructor?

Those brackets declare an empty, inline constructor. In that case, with them, the constructor does exist, it merely does nothing more than t...