Tuesday, 19 April 2016

Strings are objects in Java, so why don't we use 'new' to create them?



We normally create objects using the new keyword, like:




Object obj = new Object();


Strings are objects, yet we do not use new to create them:



String str = "Hello World";


Why is this? Can I make a String with new?


Answer




In addition to what was already said, String literals [ie, Strings like "abcd" but not like new String("abcd")] in Java are interned - this means that every time you refer to "abcd", you get a reference to a single String instance, rather than a new one each time. So you will have:



String a = "abcd";
String b = "abcd";

a == b; //True


but if you had




String a = new String("abcd");
String b = new String("abcd");


then it's possible to have



a == b; // False


(and in case anyone needs reminding, always use .equals() to compare Strings; == tests for physical equality).




Interning String literals is good because they are often used more than once. For example, consider the (contrived) code:



for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
System.out.println("Next iteration");
}


If we didn't have interning of Strings, "Next iteration" would need to be instantiated 10 times, whereas now it will only be instantiated once.


No comments:

Post a Comment

c++ - Does curly brackets matter for empty constructor?

Those brackets declare an empty, inline constructor. In that case, with them, the constructor does exist, it merely does nothing more than t...